Jump to content

David C. Murray

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

1 Follower

About David C. Murray

  • Rank
    David C. Murray Gonter
  • Birthday 12/20/1945

Recent Profile Visitors

6,361 profile views
  1. Have you had any luck getting your migraine meds, Gail?
  2. Paul's right. We just went through this but it may be difficult to find. And he's right again. Having a prescription filled for you in the U.S and then having it sent here entails a world of bureaucracy. Instead, you should be able to get a local Costa Rican physician to help you through an expedited process that only s/he can initiate. Just recently, a friend has gotten our local primary care physician to order a medication for her osteoporosis. It's not available here. It will take about two weeks to arrive. So if you have a primary care doc, ask if s/he can help. Our doctor is here in
  3. Jill, I'm not at all familiar with the area you're asking about, but I do have some thoughts about purchasing any real estate here in Costa Rica. First, come and see it with your own eyes. It's not just the property you're thinking of buying but also the adjacent ones that will impact upon your enjoyment. Then, if the area is acceptable to you, have your own attorney, not the seller's or the real estate agents', do a thorough job of researching the title to the property. Every parcel in Costa Rica is supposed to be registered in the National Registry. If it's not, back away quickly. Ther
  4. The single most interesting thing about newman's recent postings, aside from the fact that he has re-ignited the issue of having some substantiation for them, is the fact (and this is an indisputable fact) that the "total all out nuclear attack" he advocates being launched against China would likewise result in a total all out nuclear attack on the United States and the rest of the world. Should the U.S. launch newman's total all out nuclear attack on China, they would undoubtedly retaliate in kind and with equal devastation. That's the premise behind "mutual assured destruction" (you can
  5. What do you believe the USA is going to "hit" China with, newman? And why?
  6. I think Dennis makes some good points immediately above. Whether you're looking to rent, buy or build, it's important to realize that Costa Rica's land use restrictions are very lax. There's little to keep someone from building a hog farm or drop forge on the lot next to and upwind from your own. A useful caution would be to never buy or rent anything you haven't seen in person and that you haven't visited during the day and at night. Roosters may not crow much during the day, but we lived briefly in a place where they crowed all night -- ALL NIGHT LONG! Real estate listings may show th
  7. Exactly right again, Steve. One account of someone paying squatters to occupy a property hardly qualifies as proof of widespread abuses. Note, too, that nowhere in the article does the author assert that squatting, paid or not, is common. He refers only to one or two instances. We have still to learn of the source of Derrick's assertion and so must take it for a figment of his colorful imagination (and maybe bias). Derrick, that's all you've got? " . . Get over yourself . . . "? Still nothing to back up your assertion of "fact"? We can only conclude that you were, in fact,
  8. You're one hundred percent right, Steve. The problem with asserting unsubstantiated "facts" is that someone else, someone who may not yet have joined this Forum but will later, may take that unsubstantiable assertion as a true fact. If they then act on that fact, which isn't really a fact at all, they may be led to a less than optimal outcome. Imagine that someone reading this Forum wished to have a jaguar kitten to raise as a housepet. Somebody else (somebody who is talking through his hat) might write that it's safe and legal. If no one takes that second person to task, then the inqu
  9. It isn't a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, Derrick. You asserted a "fact" (see above) that a large portion of squatters are the "paid type". I'm just asking how you know that fact. If it's true, how do you know? Or is this purely conjecture on your part?
  10. Yes, except that I'm not the one who made the otherwise unsubstantiated statement of "fact". That was you. I merely asked you how you know what you say you know and what the source of your information is. It's not likely that you've personally interviewed every squatter in Costa Rica, so there must be some other source of this certain knowledge of yours. I'm simply asking what that source is. And whether this is firsthand knowledge of yours or something definitive you've read, I asked you to break down the squatters by type -- "paid types" and other types. Do you actually know of a single
  11. Derrick, please elaborate on the quote above. How do you know that a large portion of the "squatters" here are the "paid type"? Are there records you've consulted? Which records? And who pays them? And how much are they paid? And for what purpose? Of all the squatters in Costa Rica, what are the percentages of "paid type" squatters and whatever the other type or types are? Please break down the numbers for us. You are asserting a known fact, right?
  12. I think it's pretty universal that every barrio has an "inspection" committee or some such. If you can contact that person or group in your barrio, you can lodge a complaint with them and they, in turn, can lodge a complaint with the Ministry of the Environment regarding the trees that were cut down. Costa Rica takes a very, very dim view of felling trees. One of the locals did so on some friends' property and the inspection committee found out. They and MINAE made our friends replace all the trees and buy the local MINAE office a computer as a good will gesture. This saved everyone a court da
  13. Paul's right about acting promptly. In addition, it should be noted that any "improvements"(very broadly defined) that squatters make to the property may become liabilities for the property owner. That is, s/he may have to pay the squatters for whatever they've built, cleaned up, installed, etc. This is a frustrating situation for all concerned. It appears that the spirit of the law says that unused property should be available to those who need it. Think about a poor, hungry family who finds a piece of vacant land where they could live and grow crops. If the owner isn't using the prope
  14. You might try going directly to the local police chief to see if s/he can do anything.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.