Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Epicatt2

      IMPORTANT - READ BEFORE POSTING to SUPPORT FORUM   01/28/2011

      Posts to this Support Forum are to be related ONLY to one's ARCR membership. Posts inappropriate to the Support Forum will be removed without comment. Please post all other types of questions to the appropriate Forum. Only Forums Moderators, Administrators and ARCR Employees ae able to make any replies to this ARCR Support Forum. Paul M. Forums Moderator ==

stfree

Members
  • Content count

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

6 Followers

About stfree

  • Rank
    Contributing Member

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    stevefctk
  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

3,046 profile views
  1. I've done this twice. The first time was 6 years ago when I was faced with the conflicting requirements for transporting my three dogs. Because of their breeds, temperature restrictions and airline capacities, I elected to drive them from North Carolina. I purchased a Ford E-250 cargo van on eBay (like a 8 passenger van but without any rear seats or windows). I also transported my motorcycle in the back of the van at the same time. No bribes given. No harrowing experiences. Stayed in one star lodgings so I could keep the dogs with me in the room and the van under cover. Took a easterly route until Tampico, MX then turned inland. Avoided San Salvador completely. The route was very carefully chosen. It's shown on a photo album on my Facebook page called "Three Dog Fortnight". On arrival, drove the van and moto around for the legal 90 days then nationalized them. Soon thereafter sold the van for enough to pay for the trip expenses for the two of us, the cost of the van, the nationalization plus a tidy profit. The second time was four years ago. It was a for-profit run to import a particular pre-sold vehicle. Same scenario less dogs. I traveled with a male friend who has good Spanish. Mine is basic but it turned out I did most of the talking.
  2. In the past, ARCR has mailed a "Orden Patronal" monthly to each participant in it's group CCSS/CAJA plan. Now that it's been announced that will no longer be the case, what will replace that document for plan members to use to renew our DIMEX/cedulas and at CCSS when no computer is operational? The CCSS on-line registration capability is not available to non-nationals for some reason.
  3. A friend of mine has an extremely large property in the far north central part of Costa Rica, not far from the Nica border. It's a very old titled land-grant that is even shown on most maps. It has teak, hardwoods and some protected species of tree in quantities rarely seen nowadays. He's been advertising it for sale on a few web sites for a some years but, due to it's size and the resulting price (multi-millions), it hasn't generated much interest and he's in zero hurry to sell. But about 18 months ago, a prospect appeared and began negotiations while my friend was in the States. Back and forth it went over price and terms until it seemed that a agreement was in sight. Substantial earnest money was supposedly in transit from a mid-eastern bank, all done over the internet - when my friend received a panicked call from his trusted manager who lives on the property. By then my friend was back in Costa Rica and easily contacted. The manager was worried that the property had been sold (he knew a possible sale was pending) because a crew of 50 or so loggers with 10 transporters and a crane had appeared saying that the "new owners" had told them to start cutting down trees. My friend naturally told his man to stand fast - place had NOT been sold - and call in the other "hands" - about 100 live on and around the place. Jose dispatched someone to ring the big old hacienda bell - maybe the first time in 50 years that bell had been rung - the hands came a-runnin'. The stand-off was short and the out-manned loggers retreated. The "earnest" money never appeared and the "agent" and the "prospect" disappeared from the internet. This was a well-constructed and elaborate scam, the internet IP credentials were seemingly valid, the phone numbers seemed to be where they were said to be located and working. Business fronts had been constructed. If the property manager had been unable to reach my friend that day, we estimate their haul would have been a at least a million. And the trees would have faded into Nicaland. Pura Vida.
  4. I am trying to contact ARCR member Mr. James William Freeman. Can anyone help? I don't see a listing for the forums. I have his CAJA Orden Patronal for Jan 2015, which was mailed in error to me by ARCR shortly before their office closed for the year-end holiday. Of course, it arrived after I could make contact with them to sort out the error. I am asking in the hope that he has mine and that we can meet to swap. My name is Walter Freeman @ 22660122 Edit: From past experience, I know that ARCR cannot reissue a lost or missent Orden Patronal. Unless they are holding mine for pickup at the ARCR office (which would also be another error and one that has also happened), I will have to physically go to the main CAJA office in downtown San Jose for them to issue a duplicate. And that is a trip that I'd very much like to avoid. This time of year is one which is rife with errors. Pura Vida.
  5. It really doesn't matter what you do or don't do. Remember that all governments are constituted by flawed human beings. There is no rule, no law, no Constitution, no right, no citizenship that cannot be rescinded/revised or new laws/rules created that remove or reverse any now existing law - anywhere in the world. Any such law or rule created by man can be reversed. There are no inalienable rights, save those laws of physics. In the name of religion, race or political ideology, individuals and whole populations have been murdered, persecuted, expelled and imprisoned even where they had lived peaceably and productively for scored of years, even centuries. It continues today.
  6. Interesting that you bring up seismic activity on the Nicaraguan route. That issue has been raised before but not for any sound engineering motivations. In the book Overthrow by Stephen Kinzer he writes: "In 1898 the chief of the French Canal Syndicate (a group that already owned large swathes of land across Panama), Philippe Bunau Varilla, hired William Nelson Cromwell to lobby the U.S. Congress for the Panama Canal. In 1902, taking advantage of a year with increased volcanic activity in the Caribbean Sea, Cromwell planted a story in the New York Sun reporting that the Momotombo volcano had erupted and caused a series of seismic shocks. This caused concern about its possible effects on a Nicaraguan canal. Cromwell arranged for leaflets with the stamps featuring Momotombo to be sent to every Senator as "proof" of the volcanic activity in Nicaragua. An eruption in Martinique, which killed 30,000 people, persuaded most of the U.S. Congress to vote in favor of Panama, leaving only eight votes in favor of Nicaragua. The decision to build the Panama Canal passed by four votes. William Nelson Cromwell was paid $800,000 for his lobbying efforts." So even then it was good to "follow the money" to see the truth. There probably would have been a trans-Nica canal built earlier in 1849 but for the William Walker take-over. Cornelius Vanderbilt had the concession to build one and did operate a temporary over-land route until Walker arrived to rule fleetingly in Nicaragua. The Nica route resurfaced in 1850, 1897 and 1899 but by then the French were rushing to Panama. The French were suckered into the Panama route by Ferdinand de Lesseps (he of Suez canal fame) who grossly underestimated the costs and challenges of a sea-level canal thru mountains and in the tropics. The previously mentioned land ownership in Panama would also have been a factor to the financiers and speculators. By the early 1900s the French had failed (x2) in Panama, making it cheap to take over that attempt (but drastically redesigning the scope to incorporate locks) and using part of the excavation of that failed project. BTW: Some 22,000 men died during the French attempts, most of tropical diseases and sanitation issues. So we can see that engineering has played but a small role in the location of today's canal. As always, it is money and politics that rule.
  7. New York (CNN) -- Two workers at New York's John F. Kennedy Airport post office were exposed to phosphoric acid Sunday from a package that originated from China, a law enforcement official said. The package was identified after workers smelled an odor emanating from it, the official said. A hazardous response team from the FBI responded to the airport "out of an abundance of caution," said Peter Donald, a spokesman for the FBI in New York. The product was identified as organophosphate and secured by Port Authority police. The package was contained to the post office, and airport operations were not affected, the official said. Donald said the package "was determined to be beauty supplies." Another one bites the dust. Next, please.
  8. It's already gone past there. It is almost a "bait-and-switch" proposition now.
  9. And I expect they will consider the intent of the following: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Definition of the word "welfare" as originally applied: "Welfare welfare n. 1. health, happiness, or prosperity; well-being. [<ME wel faren, to fare well] Source: AHD Welfare in today's context also means organized efforts on the part of public or private organizations to benefit the poor, or simply public assistance. This is not the meaning of the word as used in the Constitution." ref: The United States Constitution - http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Preamble The Constitutional Dictionary - http://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#WELFARE I'm no Supreme but it appears that there is reason to believe that HEALTH is a valid area for government activity.
  10. Hi DanaJ I am sure that MortSahl does not have administrator privileges on the Forum and it requires an administrator to do such a thing. My best guess is that this was seen as a better place for this discussion than the "colone vs. dollar" it was originally in and one of the admins moved it.
  11. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. The items as listed above are NOT correct. Social Security and DHHS are not a part of the discretionary budget group. Defense/security is discretionary and accounts for 22.22% ($680B) of the TOTAL budget, not 20.1% of only 38%. Defense is also expected to require an additional supplemental spending bill, possibly in the range of $40–50 billion, later this Spring. SS and DHHS belong to the group of "mandated" expenditures, as they are referred to in the budget. They they do account for 60.03% of the total budget and are already fixed in existing law - from many successive administrations. A breakdown within the "entitlements" group, as you incorrectly call them, (which is now codespeak for welfare), you will find Social Security (19.27%) and Medicare/Medicaid (19.21%). Among others are: interest expense, military retirement, veteran's benefits, farm commodity price support, crop insurance, TARP and farm income support programs. This according to the OMB for the latest year (www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/tables.pdf) And if you are referring to Social Security as welfare - with the back-door agenda of eliminating it - well, you'll find people like me who paid into it for over 50 years and absolutely demand it's delivered as promised. It's OUR money. Now that the free-for-all on Wall Street has decimated the middle class net worth thru it's "insured" investments, SS is of much more importance. It's the one issue that will unite the lower 90% against the top 10%. Anyone that wants to get knocked silly politically by messing with it - go ahead - make our day. BTW: You're no Mort Sahl. Here's a quote from the REAL Mort Sahl: "Liberals feel unworthy of their possessions. Conservatives feel they deserve everything they've stolen."
  12. Hi there Happy; Paul (Epicatt) is right but maybe a litle soft here - but hey, we love the place and hate to point out the warts but warts there are. Even in normal times there were a multitude of projects in Costa Rica that would never be finished by the original developers. Now, as a result of the recession, it is much worse; a few projects are on their third and fourth resurrections and re-marketing and are about to go bust AGAIN. BEWARE! The legal system here does NOT protect the buyer anywhere close to the extent you are familiar with in the States. There is NO requirement for "agents" to be licensed or have any qualifications. Projects are often started without proper or with questionable permitting (a game of dice in itself) in place and with shaky or minimal capital. So, part way into development (and after lots of deposits have been taken), some governmental agency will issue a "stop" order or the money simply "runs out". And there it will sit, unresolved, until the glacial legal system grinds. I would NEVER commit money to anything here that did not already exist 100% and I would need to see a clear Registro entry (title) on it. Even then caution is the word... I'm not exaggerating. It's the Wild West. There ARE opportunities here but you should not expect that you can make a purchase of one without substantial knowledge, in-person examination and trustworthy counsel.
  13. There must be some strange transformation of Fox programming when viewed from Costa Rica, as TG clearly is a model of critical thinking and discernment. Come on TG - are you Trolling? The above statement has NEVER applied to Fox as known and loved in the States. Consider: Would a true neo-con tolerate anything that offers ideological balance and moderation?
  14. Status? What's a status? I have no status now - I'm not sure I ever did.

  15. WOW - that IS different. I see better edit tools right off the bat..
×